Valley River Blog

I'm writing this as a Volunteer at the Valley River Humane Shelter in response to a request to explain my posted comments in searching for rescues for animals from the Shelter near Marble, North Carolina.  These are my observations only and do not reflect official policies or views of the board or any administrator and in particular, my wife, who is one of the Shelter co-directors.

 

The direction and operation of the Shelter changed directions in February when new volunteer co-directors replaced the previous director.  The new direction has produced a political struggle between the "Old Guard" who originally founded the organization to handle strays and the “Newcomers” (myself included) who have moved it towards being a low-kill facility. The election of a new board on June 19th will determine if it continues in its present direction of using new volunteers to find more fosters and increase local adoptions to prevent animals being put down for lack of space. The "Old Guard" is led by many of the ex-presidents of the Society.  This is a philosophical difference on the never-ending problem over how to handle large numbers of strays but it has a major impact on the lives of the strays.

 

Major changes occurred at the Shelter following the appointment of the volunteer co-directors. They found the past record keeping did not show what had happened to many of the animals and the Shelter and its associated spay and neuter clinic were being operated in the red and would soon be bankrupt.  In addition, the septic tank system was leaking into the lower parking lot, the telephone system and computer systems rarely worked, and the security system did not work at all. Through private donors these problems were fixed and the adjacent grounds were cleared of stumps, gravel was added to the parking lots, and outdoor exercise yards were built so that all the 70 plus dogs normally present could spend time outside (weather permitting). New workers were hired to enhance the care of the dogs and a dog trainer was hired as the new kennel manager.  The training has helped make the Shelter dogs more adoptable. New volunteers stepped up to the plate to help with adoptions, transports, etc and the Shelter began to operate in the black and essentially as a "no kill" or "low kill" through a tripling of local adoptions, more fosters, more rescues, and the twice monthly transport shuttle to an out-of-state, no-kill humane shelter (that was begun under the previous director). I think the present kill rate is 10 to 15% for all dogs (including puppies). I'm not sure what it is for cats but probably higher due to the feral cat problem. With these improvements came an improvement in morale and everything seemed to be going well.

 

However, some of the ex-officers who have been responsible for overseeing the Shelter in the past were not pleased with the new changes in the Shelter operation.  The society president (who disagreed with the co-directors) resigned.  And rumors began to spread through the community that the Shelter was putting down large numbers of animals which was the exact opposite of what was going on.  To counter these rumors, the co-directors held informational public meetings.  Letters were sent to the newspaper (Cherokee Scout) from volunteers and fosters, explaining what was happening in the Shelter and asking the public to come see for themselves.  The ex-society presidents responded in the public meetings by disagreeing with the concept of moving towards a "no kill" or "low kill" Shelter and in a counter letter to the newspaper extolled the virtues of controlling the Stray problem by quickly putting down animals that are difficult to adopt.  (The letters should be available online from the newspaper web site.) The stage has been set for a power struggle between the two groups.  Ex-presidents dominate the nominating committee for the board, and I have yet to hear who has been nominated to serve on the board.

 

The politics are further complicated by the Animal Control issue. The Shelter has operated Animal Control for four counties for years, picking up and/or accepting about 3,000 dogs and cats a year and paying 2 to 3 animal control officers along with maintaining two vehicles for that purpose. The volunteer co-directors were informed by county officials that the last animal contract had expired years earlier and the largest county (Cherokee County from which 75% of the animals came) wanted to do its own Animal Control.  Through auditing, the directors found the payments from Cherokee County had only amounted to about $35 an animal while the true costs were about $80, including the cost of picking up the animals, medical procedures, and kennel or cage costs.  Cherokee County responded, saying that these costs were not their responsibility. They only wanted the Shelter to hold an animal for three days and then put it down, so medical procedures and long kennel stays were not necessary.  Furthermore, they were not responsible for the strays, only nuisance animals in which the police were called, i.e., a stray walking on the road or starving at a dump was not breaking any law and hence, not their responsibility.  The Shelter responded by saying it would accept strays from the public but would ask the public to work with them on space and costs, e.g., ask for a $50 donation (or any donation that the public would pay) and if space was a problem, try to get the public to help foster dogs (for a week until the shuttle frees up space) and cats.  But Shelter employees are told to never reject an animal if the person turning it in refuses or cannot make a donation and/or foster it.  If necessary, excess dogs can be housed outside in the exercise yards.

 

The other three counties do take responsibility for their strays and are in the process of negotiating animal control contracts with the Shelter.  Requesting a donation from the public and the use of a one week waiting list when space is not available are controversal issues with the "ex-presidents" of the Society.  They believe that people bringing in strays should not be asked to help and excess animals should just be quickly put down.  The Shelter has offered people bringing in stray dogs the option of walking through the kennel area and picking out a dog to be put down so that the Shelter could intake their dog.  To date, no one has taken the Shelter up on that offer; however, to the best of our knowledge, none of these were ex-presidents.

 

So on June 19th, we'll find out the future direction of the Valley River Humane Shelter.

 



Ron Stoessell

ronlondi@charter.net

985 630 1613